Above all, Maud pinned her personal and political colors to the pillar of government transparency. he recently said
Transparency is at the heart of the government's plans, which is why the Cabinet Office, the nerve center of government, is in the driver's seat. All departments are expected to publish their data in the coming weeks.
The outpouring of honesty and generosity continues…
We are pulling back the curtains to let light into the corridors of power. _ By being open and accountable, you can begin to regain people's trust. For those of us in government, being open is not comfortable. However, it allows the people to hold their feet to the fire. This path will lead to better government. Transparency is key to improving our efficiency and enabling us to engage the public to achieve better value for money in public spending. Today is just the beginning of what we have planned. We are determined to set an example for the wider public sector and create a 'right to data' at the core of government operations.
So who is the middle-aged woman with the empty shopping cart? None other than Julia Middleton, the chief executive of the political charity Common Purpose, earns a salary of around £85,000 a year, mostly from the taxpayer.
Common purpose and dirty dealings
The relationship between Maud and Middleton is an interesting one. Mr Hoist-Maud is at the heart of a Conservative government said to be trying to achieve major public spending cuts, while Mr Middleton is raising public funds to train socialist “leaders”. There is. But alongside money with a common purpose comes nepotism, if not fraud.
A damning and confidential 11-page Surrey County Council audit report, dated September 2009, revealed internally that a £48,000 council deal with Common Purpose to send four senior staff and 10 external representatives to a CP training course It was created after an investigation failed to justify it. Several senior Council officers, including Chief Executive Richard Shaw, have previously served on the Common Purpose Advisory Committee and were exempted from the Council's normal procurement processes when the contract was awarded. Among other criticisms of the council's relationship with Common Purpose, the report said:
It is the auditor's opinion that the 10 grants under the Surrey (Common Purpose) InsideOUT program failed to demonstrate value for money.
Although not reported by the mainstream press or media, Sheffield City Council recently had its public accounts of around £1 billion frozen by the auditor for misconduct related to common purpose agreements. Like Surrey, Sheffield is already full of Common Purpose graduates.
In numerous other documented examples, Common Purpose has used public facilities for free, casually arranged future payments from within public sector budgets such as Education Leeds, broken data protection laws and We have created a “blacklist” of members of the public who ask questions. Concerning common purpose, public funds, vested interests and justice. Transparency is clearly not one of its strong points, as Common Purpose has secretive alumni and supporters in both the Audit Office and the Information Commissioner's Office, not to mention the police, courts and prisons.
But the immediate concern for cost-cutting Tories is that Common Purpose has already drained around £100m of taxpayers' money from the public purse over 25 years to pay for behavioral and neurolinguistic-based training. This means that thousands of talented people are being produced. They are called “graduate school leaders for new working adults.'' The vision of the new Common Purpose belief system is to reorder traditional British society to fit the political and cultural transformation agenda of utopian socialism. The so-called third sector, charity and voluntary sectors are at the heart of this change or paradigm shift.
It must also be remembered that Common Purpose is at the heart of the Blair-No-Labour socialist government and operates in close collaboration with the Prescott empire of the Deputy Prime Minister's Office. So how did the friendship develop between Common Purpose and Francis Maude?
Dear Frances, Dear Julia – Behind the Scenes Actors of the Darkness
Email from Julia Middleton to Frances Maud
True conservatives would know that Maude and Cameron's Cabinet Office are in secret dialogue with Middleton to use the “shared purpose model” to achieve “culture change” in the top 200 civil servants. You'll be shocked. Emails obtained by UK Column show that Common Purpose is attempting to use its personal contacts with Maude at the Cabinet Office to secure a “training” contract. The email dated May 18, 2010 states:
Dear Frances, I think we, and a significant number of Common Purpose graduates in the civil service, can help with the culture change that you need to bring about. Can me and David Bell (Common Purpose Trustee Chair) come and meet for 5 minutes? Love Julia
The all-too-familiar ending, “Love Julia,” seems to indicate a very personal friendship between Middleton and Maud, or perhaps Middleton's excesses with other government officials who had previously tried to secure him a contract. It also seems to reflect familiarity.
Other documents obtained by UK Column reveal more about Mr Middleton's call for common purpose than initially appeared in public view. Item 7 of the Senior Leadership Committee Minutes dated June 9, 2010, provided by the Cabinet Office: Other corporate status:
It was proposed to conduct a workshop for the top 200 people (civil servants) based on the Common Purpose Model. Committee members agreed to consider costs.
Cabinet Office Leaders Committee Minutes – Page 1
Cabinet Office Leaders Committee Minutes – Page 2
Contrary to Francis Maud's declaration,
Transparency is at the heart of the government's plans, which is why the Cabinet Office, at the heart of the government, is leading the charge.
The Cabinet Office cover letter for the June 9 minutes states:
The summary of the meeting of the Senior Leadership Committee has been compiled in accordance with Article 1 of the Data Protection Act to remove any “personal data” directly relating to third parties or their employment.
Readers should note that while the original document is made available to the public by redacting or blacking out information, the Cabinet Office's “editing” of leadership meeting minutes distorts the information without a trace. They will understand that the possibility of loss or loss will be ensured and the process will be transparent. Like a fog.
Why is Maud's Cabinet Office so reluctant to publish the truth?Despite crude attempts at censorship, the minutes suggest a classic case of insider trading and conflicts of interest. Gus O'Donnell chairs the Senior Leadership Committee. He is also Cabinet Secretary and Secretary of the Home Office and Civil Service, so he has authority over all civil servants, including hiring and promotion. What's particularly interesting about this case is that he appears to be an enthusiastic supporter of Common Purpose.
Janet Paraskeva (First Civil Service Commissioner) is also a Common Purpose supporter and senior alumnus, and has close ties to Julia Middleton. Paraskeva attended the June 9th senior leadership meeting and other meetings.
Surprisingly, Mr. David Bell is also an attendee on the Senior Leadership Committee in his business title at Pearson, and indeed he attended the June 9th meeting. Mr Bell is, of course, the very same David Bell, chairman of the Common Purpose Board, mentioned in Mr Middleton's first email to Maud. Apart from his personal involvement with more than 23 companies, he is said to be aiming to “protect” the independence of the British media with the help of the corporate sector, including international banks. He is also involved in the purpose-driven Media Standards Trust.
There were no expressions of interest from Common Purpose members who attended the June 9th meeting, unless Maud's own Cabinet Office staff compiled them, and which other Leadership Committee members themselves have Common Purpose training. There are no signs about either.
Insider trading and not disclosing activities under the cover of the so-called “Chatham House Rule” is standard practice among Common Purpose Graduate Students. At the other end of the scale, the Common Purpose Network has hidden pedophiles. Witness Cameron was recently photographed with Merseyside joint purpose pedophile Matthew Byrne.
As noted, while the documentary evidence of Common Purpose's ethics abuses across the public sector is overwhelming, Maude's case shows that Common Purpose is dedicated to eradicating waste and ensuring public transparency. is at the heart of the Conservative government.
Apart from his position as chair of the new Public Transparency Commission, based at the Cabinet Office, Mr Maud also appears on Common Purpose's website as an active supporter. Will there be another conflict of interest?
Local Conservatives are cheated by the Central Office
Before the last general election, a number of well-informed local Conservative Party activists instilled the tenets of Nu Labor socialism within the staff of common purpose political activities, particularly unitary authorities, councils, quangos and third parties. They became concerned about the political activities of common purpose that they had helped to sustain. Sector using a secret graduate school network. Local councilors believe that even if a Conservative party is elected, common cause 'leadership' among key council officers could effectively undermine and neutralize Conservative policies and values. I noticed something right away.
Conservative MPs across the UK have begun collecting information on common objectives and reporting it to Conservative Party headquarters. Despite their growing concerns, they were told not to worry, Common Purpose would be expelled from major organizations once Cameron came to power. During that time, they were encouraged to watch, listen and report, but not to make public noises. This advice can now be seen as a deliberate deception by Cameron's central government. In line with the policy of Fabian socialism, which advises “denying with the mouth what the hands do'', the Maud Cabinet Office was caught actively embedding the doctrine of Common Purpose Labor Socialism into the core of the British civil service. Ta. “Restructuring” and “socialist reeducation” of the top 200 civil servants.
Further evidence that Prime Minister Cameron's LibCon entourage is a Blairite clone with a common purpose is easy to find. The Cabinet Office recently announced that around 180 quangos will be cut. Quango is a highly unaccountable group that has been used to spread new socialist policies in the public sector and wider society with the support of Common Purpose. In a letter dated August 26 and seen by the BBC, Mr Maud said a further 124 quangos would be merged (apart from the 180 quangos that would be cut) and that 56 quangos would remain subject to “substantial reform”. suggested that 282 quangos be maintained.
Sounds good, but thanks to the Taxpayers' Alliance we now know that there are actually 1,162 quangos in existence, with a total budget of around £64bn. So how many will actually remain, most of them? Rather than attack this bureaucratic cancer and recover the billions of dollars wasted, Cameron created two superquangoes: an independent commission for the NHS and the Office for Budget Responsibility (setting the UK's fiscal framework). At the same time, it is creating another public smokescreen. However, common purpose cancer is already established in both the NHS and the Treasury. For example, Helen Bailey has overall responsibility for overseeing public spending on education and children at the Treasury. Health; Housing, Communities and Local Government. In total, the UK's devolved countries and territories spend more than £250 billion a year on public spending. Of course she is a common cause.
While Francis Maud is secretly betraying true conservatives, David Cameron prefers to ignore the concerns of ordinary conservatives and will be hosting a major Common Purpose International event in Bangalore, India in August this year. launched. Conservatives should not be surprised by his betrayal. Prime Minister David Cameron told the 1922 Committee that they needed to “get used to the new world order”.
The tenet of socialism has always been to establish a world socialist government, and Common Purpose International already unites Common Purpose socialist organizations around the world to support that goal. True conservatives should realize that Julia Middleton's shopping cart is never empty. However, it is difficult to see extreme socialist content.
