Littlejohn commented:
The relentless march of political interference and the institutionalized insanity of elf safety have made firefighters objects of ridicule and ridicule.
Unfortunately, for ordinary people, the truth is much more sinister. Common sense, rational judgment, and risk-taking are not “disappearing” but are being attacked and destroyed by evil government-sponsored applied behavior change psychology. This is not a myth. This is a fact-based scheme that the Government has already invested millions of pounds into.
To understand how dangerous this program is, let's do a little analysis of how Littlejohn views the Seagull debacle and its causes. The first reaction is ridicule….the general reaction from the public….he says:
On a surface level, this is hilarious and a ripe source of satire, but it's another absurd example of the risk-averse, elf-safety culture that is blighting British society.
Little John then connects the dots…
But what if it wasn't a seagull, but a shipwrecked human? Sadly, we already know the answer.
Last year, more than a dozen emergency workers were refused permission to pull Simon Burgess, 41, from a three-foot-deep boating lake in Hampshire, citing safety regulations.
He went on to say that after the 2005 terrorist attack, Karl Malton, 32, who drowned in 18 inches of water in Lincolnshire after he refused to let rescuers go into the water, came out of a tube station smoking. Cited about reported survivors. They found firefighters refusing to enter the tunnel due to health and safety concerns.
As the article progresses, Littlejohn gives examples of training that undermines the performance and reputation of fire departments. Health and safety are common themes, but he reports in more detail.
Then there's the ridiculous “diversity” issue, with firefighters in Scotland facing disciplinary action, demotions and pay cuts for refusing to wear their uniforms to gay pride rallies.
Curious, I randomly checked the Hertfordshire Fire Brigade website. It appears to be from Haringey Social Services and is written in typical public sector gibberish.
Under “Equality and Diversity: Utilizing the Fire Department,” the fire chief boasts: . . We were able to make part of the fire station available to local residents.
If we were able to assess the risk, we could open up some of our meeting rooms and provide an opportunity for different groups to meet more easily, who previously had difficulty finding a venue. These include the Polish community, LGBT youth, Hoddesdon's Lithuanian community groups… Lincolnshire Fire Brigade has introduced special uniforms (full-length) aimed at attracting Muslim female recruits. skirts and hijabs) (if that's the right word). What does that mean for elf safety? Have you ever tried climbing a ladder wearing a burqa?
Lincolnshire Fire Chief Mike Thomas said the uniforms would help eliminate the “traditional image of firefighters as stocky, white British men”.
Littlejohn uses many words and phrases in his articles to describe the events he sees.
Political interference and institutionalized insanity, hilarity – a ripe source of satire, crazy elf safety directives, ridiculous “diversity” agendas, politicization and evisceration of the fire service, this madness – this is just the police and the fire service But the whole public sector, shitty rules and initiatives, and fucked up people in the public sector.
The whole tenet of his phrases is “funny” and “crazy”. His account is particularly interesting, bearing in mind that he also identifies that one of the consequences of the “training” that firefighters receive is the real possibility of injury or death to members of the public. is. Should we laugh or be very worried?
According to Littlejohn, a kind of madness is engulfing not just the fire service but the public sector as a whole. I suspect many other reasonable people would agree with his comments.
But what makes this whole business truly sinister is that the “laughable madness” that Littlejohn is now accusing of and which seems to be causing some discord in his mind is no coincidence. It's not the result of some stupid, haphazard effort or training course that miraculously appeared out of nowhere.
In fact, this “madness” that is currently destroying the order and stability of our lives and society, resulting in the deaths of good people in hospitals, nursing homes, ponds, fires, police custody, etc., is intentional and deliberate manipulation of people's minds.
How is it done? Through the application of behavior change psychology, through the course itself in health and safety, diversity, leadership, change management, reframing, or a number of other training course titles.
Who is doing it? We know because they tell us so. Through its manifesto and funded Behavior Change Agenda, the Cabinet Office now has Behavior Change Offices in all major departments of government and, most importantly, in all public sector training institutions.
Unbeknownst to Littlejohn, all three major political parties are working together to introduce and disseminate a behavior change agenda using neuro-linguistic programming NLP and many sophisticated derivative programs. The Conservatives even brought in French experts to help them. Professor Olivier Houllier is an associate professor of neuroscience at the University of Provence and an advisor to the French Center for Strategic Analysis, as well as a member of the 'Leadership' of the Conservative Party Cabinet Office. team.
Most sinisterly, in its own 'Mindspace' document, the government says of the Cabinet Office's program to influence behavior through public policy:
It depends, at least in part, on automatic influences on behavior. That means the public may not be fully aware that their behavior is changing, or at least how it is changing.
Far from being laughably insane, Littlejohn has just awakened to a cold, cold, evil attack on our hearts. The goal is to take away the ability to think for yourself. My challenge to Littlejohn began in May 2009, when the Mail reported that PC Tony Cobban had refused to ride a stationary bike for a photo because he had not taken a bicycle safety course. , I want you to understand that he didn't do it because of . “Laughing Madness”. He refused because he actually believed he shouldn't ride a bike because his thinking, behavior, and common sense values had actually changed. That man is no fool. he is a victim
What our government refuses to tell us is that interfering with people's thinking and reasoning without their knowledge is extremely dangerous and can cause mental illness. This is especially true if the victim is prone to mental instability such as depression. Witness the massive application of NLP in education and the significant increase in youth suicide. The number of suicides within the police force is also increasing. Who's next – the fire brigade?
For more information on the Government's behavior change agenda, see UK Column 2011 Issue No1.
