If you believe the mainstream media, and unfortunately most people do, the most pressing problem is The so-called party gate The problem is that the government “broke the rules,” and while this breaking of the rules is infuriating, it's neither unexpected nor unusual.
Throughout history, politicians have been found to have broken the rules they set for themselves. The laws they enactOn countless occasions. These small groups always contain a disproportionate number of people who think they are above the law. This behavior is entirely normal for politicians.
Many of those present at the rally, including British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak and then-Health Secretary Matt Hancock, were instrumental in implementing the national lockdown for others. Millions of Americans were placed under effective house arrest as this group of Conservative politicians, advisors and government officials ignored their own restrictions.
Neither the mainstream media nor politicians are prepared to discuss the real issues. A collaborative wall of silence has been erected to keep the majority of people from realizing the true nature of the wrongdoing, with the goal of excluding from the conversation those who would talk about the most obvious effects of Partygate.
Partners in the cover-up
People may be rightly outraged by the hypocrisy revealed in the Partygate scandal, but the mainstream media Related Stories This completely obscures the real issue: the mainstream media was quick to use the emotional stories of people who were unable to visit dying loved ones or lost their jobs when the companies they worked for went bankrupt to sell their preferred storyline: they all “played the rules.”
The mainstream media only talked about the inherent “unfairness” of partygoers breaking the rules. One rule for them And one more for everyone else.
Politicians from both parties repeated the exact same story. Penalty Notice Boris Johnson has apologised for breaking the rules and reinforced his official position. He told parliament:
At the time, and even afterwards, I never thought that holding a meeting in the Cabinet Room just before an important meeting on COVID-19 countermeasures would be a violation of the rules. (Omitted) I would like to reiterate that it was my mistake and for that I sincerely apologize.
Then there was the apparently heated response from Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer. In a message full of emotion, Starmer also completely ignored the most important issue: like Prime Minister Johnson and the mainstream media at large. The only concern he expressed was There was a clear lack of fairness and respect.
I spoke to John Robinson this morning… I want to tell you his story… When his wife died of Covid-19, John and his family followed the Prime Minister's rules… He followed the Prime Minister's rules. We now know that the Prime Minister recklessly, repeatedly and deliberately ignored those rules. If the Prime Minister had any respect for John, and the millions of people like him who have sacrificed everything to follow the rules, she would resign.
Starmer's response was simply to tell a story to undermine his opponent. As Leader of the Opposition, he never asked tough questions of the Johnson government, despite fierce attacks. He simply repeated the same story told by the government and its supporters. Mainstream Media Partners Starmer was just as keen as Johnson to maintain the deception.
Either way, Starmer appears to have committed the same breach of the rules for which he accused Johnson. Tougher lockdownhe was there I took a picture of me drinking beer. At a constituency “meeting.”
Starmer said the group were “at work” and therefore technically not “breaking the rules” – an incredibly unlikely explanation that was enough to elude a police investigation. Swilling beer and slurping canapés is apparently a regular “at work” activity for the Labour leader.
A quick scan of social media or even a single overheard conversation shows just how successful this distraction propaganda has been. People are understandably infuriated when they find out that the people who made the rules have been breaking them. They take to the internet to vent their anger, bitterly complaining about the harsh reality of a political class that sees them only as subjects to be dominated.
Perhaps the anger and disappointment are justified, but by following the approved mainstream media script, ordinary people Also It ignores the real issue. Many of us seem to be fooled into arguing over trivial matters without realizing the gravity of the crimes that have actually been committed.
The real Partygate crime
Their actions were indicative of the people attending the Downing Street party. I didn't believe there was a pandemic.Regardless of their words, their actions made it clear that they were not worried about transmitting or catching the disease: there was no risk of the pandemic to them, and the pandemic did not exist.
In a real pandemic or epidemic, people feel scared. That's natural, because any social activity carries the risk of being deadly. This was not the case with the COVID-19 pandemic that the World Health Organization (WHO) claims, nor was it the case in the WHO's 2009 report. H1N1 influenza pandemic.
In both cases, pandemic mortality was only seen in the attribution of causes of death based on computer models and fake tests, not in the actual data. Another pseudo-pandemic.
Instead, people were made to feel fear through government propaganda, censorship, and applied psychology operations. Some of those who led the terror campaign were members of the political establishment who enjoyed the drinking parties in question. They did so with the implicit understanding that they were not in danger; otherwise, why would they attend or organize these gatherings in the first place?
These were the people who were supposed to have direct access to the best scientific advice – none had been better briefed on the dangers of COVID-19 than the Partygate and Labour “meeting” attendees – and yet they were not the least bit worried.
The people making the COVID-19 rules weren't just people who didn't see any risk from the disease they told everyone to fear. These indifferent people included leading scientists, scientific advisors and many members of Congress, all of whom promoted a COVID-19 fear policy.
Professor Neil Ferguson said: Disastrous prediction model He didn’t care about maintaining the protective family bubble that everyone else was being told to adhere to, which was the main source of his initial anxiety, and he ignored the risks he laid out in his own paper. Continue the affairIn doing so, he risked exposing himself, his family, and his girlfriend to what he called a very dangerous disease. Clearly, he did not take this risk seriously.
In response to Ferguson's fiasco, Partygate participant Matt Hancock, who was then Health Secretary, was quick to say the rules were “very strict” and applied “to everyone”. Follow the rules That was the only issue discussed. No preventative health benefits were seen The finer points of following the rules were studiously ignored.
Hancock subsequently misled the public by publicly stating that it was “impossible” for Ferguson to remain a government adviser, but Ferguson continued to advise Hancock and other government ministers as part of the government advisory council. Advisory Group on Emerging Respiratory Viral Threats (NERV Tag).
Hancock also didn't think there was a risk, having not only partied with friends during lockdown but also flouted social distancing rules. Continue the affairLike Ferguson, Hancock had no problem breaking the rules and was not at all worried about the pandemic.
Scotland's Chief Medical Officer Dr Catherine Calderwood said: I took my kids on vacation. During the lockdown, Dr Calderwood was cautioned by police for urging all Scottish residents to “stay at home to protect the NHS and save lives”. Not only did she not actually care about saving anyone's life, she also seemed happy to expose her own children to a supposedly deadly disease. It is clear that Dr Calderwood was also unaware of the health threat posed by the pandemic.
Tobias Ellwood, MP for Bournemouth (current Chair of the UK Defence Select Committee) 77th Brigade In June 2020, the Royal Military Academy (RMA) spoke of how people gathered together sunbathing on a beach in Bournemouth. Vitamin D Essential for Respiratory Virus PreventionHe said:
A critical incident was declared because social distancing measures were ignored. (…) We need to learn from this and realise that if we are going to tackle this pandemic seriously, we need to move faster to provide support to local authorities. (…) I do not want to see Bournemouth or any other seaside resort be the first place where a second wave emerges.
A few months later, Elwood Attended a Christmas party An event hosted by the Iraqi UK Business Council during lockdown. Like Starmer, he argued that working on his knees counted as work, ignoring the fact that he violated the spirit of social distancing and lockdown rules. He clearly did not seem to be “taking this pandemic seriously”.
Dominic Cummings, then chief strategic adviser to the Prime Minister Defeated the intention He broke lockdown and social distancing restrictions by taking his family on a 540-mile round trip to County Durham. He had previously had coronavirus and suspected his wife might have it too, but he piled their young son into the car, sat in a small, enclosed space and set off on the four-and-a-half-hour drive.
Again, Cummings defended himself by claiming there was “no technical breach.” This point is practically irrelevant. Presumably, neither he nor his wife cared about exposing their young son and the rest of their family, including their parents, to what they both believed was COVID-19. Frankly, they did not realise the real risks of the pandemic.
The list goes on: Robert Jenrick (Housing and Communities Secretary), Stephen Kinnock (Shadow Secretary of State for Asia and the Pacific and husband of former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt), Margaret Ferrier (Rutherglen and Hamilton West) and Bob Seely (Isle of Wight) have all been accused of “breaching the rules”.
Whether they did or not, whatever technical defense they might offer, By their actions All of these people said they did not believe there was a significant risk from the pandemic, but all maintained consistently that this threat exists.
The real crime exposed by Partygate is not that the people who made the rules broke them, but that some of the architects of the lockdowns and social distancing policies that devastated the economy and instilled fear in nearly every citizen never believed for a moment that there was any public health justification for taking such actions.
It is truly astonishing that neither a single member of Congress nor mainstream media coverage has mentioned this glaring fact. The political and journalistic establishment has stubbornly maintained this ambiguity for almost two years. With apparent conspiracy across Congress, the political establishment and the media, the Partygate controversy has effectively been reframed and its most serious consequences hidden from public attention.
If the people who designed and pushed the lockdown rules were not so concerned about the public health risks of the so-called pandemic, what were these policies trying to achieve? If these people understood that there was no public health justification for destructive lockdown policies, why did they push for them? Huge economic and social costs?
Who are these people and who do they represent?
