Interview with Professor David Scott Richard Enos A professor at the University of Edinburgh, he was one of the earliest to speak out against it. COVID lockdown. His stance was based on data and sound reasoning. It was rejected by the Scottish Government.
This wide-ranging discussion covers the evidence that led Richard to speak out, as well as the censorship and slander he faced afterwards. We examine the culture of fear created among the masses by state propaganda, constant “scientific” threats, and aggressive crackdowns on protests and dissent.
In what is effectively a brief look back at the entire coronavirus crisis, Richard and David discuss the early medical response. Policies affecting care homes. Issues surrounding data, testing, and computer modeling. Next, we examine the evidence pointing to the problem of vaccine side effects.
Richard Enos has become the second British professor, after Norman Fenton, to tell a British column that he is ashamed of the way academia works. The overarching theme of this debate is the inability of academia to speak truth to power and the collapse of the national scientific narrative, resulting in a lack of trust despite the widespread and provable harm created by this policy. This is something that people in positions of authority are unable to speak honestly about. The response to Covid-19 and the immoral nature of what has been done to our society.
