Efforts towards the creation of a global pandemic treaty It has been ongoing since at least early 2021 through too many international forums to comprehensively document, and intensified in the wake of the World Health Organization’s 2022 World Health Summit (WHS), held in Berlin, Germany, in mid-October 2022. I watched some of it via Zoom link and covered it in the October 17 episode of UK Column News from just after the 30 minute mark.
The WHS explored the following broad topic areas: Food Systems and Health and Digital transformation for health To Climate change and planetary healthThese areas were then subdivided into subtopics, the latter of which persisted in equating pandemics with a “health threat” posed by “global warming.” But in terms of determining the basic components and timeline of a global pandemic treaty, the overarching topic was Architecture for Pandemic Awareness.
Given the growing evidence that so-called corona “vaccines,” which are in fact mRNA gene therapies and clearly do not fit the definition of a traditional vaccine, are causing widespread harm and death, and given that the first corona lockdowns of 2020 severely damaged food supplies, healthcare, economic activity, collective worship, family visits, school attendance, and other normal societal functions, and triggered backlash in many states and regions around the world, top-down enforcement is to be expected in a recurrence scenario. A Global Pandemic Treaty would be expected to bind all signatory countries to a strict common protocol to combat current and future pandemics.
Such a treaty would mean that individual nations and local governments within them would be subject to much more centralized control, likely in the face of a vastly empowered WHO, making it much more difficult for nation-states to adopt their own policies and maintain constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties and health care choices.
If recent history teaches us anything, the consequences could be particularly nightmarish, especially given how a country like Australia has become a de facto penal colony. yellow card (UK) and Verse (US) Government Data Harmful effects There have been cases of people dying after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and there are still cases occurring on a large scale, yet little has been done to address them. Can the current governance system be trusted in the name of a global treaty, no matter how rational and well-intentioned the drafters of the treaty may have been?
Drafting the Treaty
The WHS workshop in Berlin on 17 October was the closest thing to a proposed global pandemic treaty, and explicitly stated: The role of parliamentarians in developing a global pandemic treatyNotably, the session was convened by UNITE (World Network of Parliamentarians) and the German Health Alliance, and chaired by Dr Juan de Dios Cinquégui of the Austral University in Argentina. Also speaking were UNITE founder Dr Ricardo Baptista Leite from Portugal, and three representatives from the UK, one of whom was Member of Parliament, former NM Rothschild & Sons employee and current Labour MP Liam Byrne (Birmingham Hodge Hill), who also chairs the German Health Alliance. World Parliamentary Network on the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (Dr. Leite was Vice-Chair), Naomi Burke Shine, Executive Director of Harm Reduction International, and Ms. Barbara Stocking, Chair of the World Public Health Congress Panel.
Regarding the October 17 workshop, WHS organizers said in an online statement:
The UNITE Global Health Parliamentary Network and the World Bank-IMF Parliamentary Network have culminated in the creation of the International Forum on Global Health in 2021, a working group that brings together members from 12 different international parliamentary conferences and networks around the world under a common global health and economic agenda.
The statement added:
In 2022, the Working Group will focus on pandemic preparedness and developing a list of recommendations to be incorporated into the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) negotiations.
The statement further said that the INB will work in five main areas:
- Governance and Leadership
- Laws and national regulatory systems
- fairness
- Accountability and Oversight
- Funding
INB's key role in pandemic preparedness
As the author of this UK column pointed out in a previous article this year about the manoeuvres towards a pandemic treaty, the INB appears to be the lead treaty-making body in this policy area.
An article posted online on May 18, 2022, just before the WHO's 75th World Health Assembly at the UK House of Commons Library outlines that “WHO is negotiating pandemic preparedness,” but its roots go back to March 2021. That month, a “group of world leaders” led by then-UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson “announced an initiative for a new treaty on pandemic preparedness and response.” From there, “the initiative would be brought to the WHO to be negotiated, drafted and discussed by a newly established intergovernmental negotiating body.”
The INB was formally established at the second special session of the World Health Assembly in WHO history, held in December 2021, with the objective of drafting and negotiating a WHO Convention on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response. The first public hearing was held in April 2022.
The determination seems strong among those fixated on bringing numerous countries under a single, increasingly tightly controlled health authority, based on what another WHS workshop described as “one voice” for a “one health strategy.” That particular workshop focused on Europe, noting its ultranationalist goals:
(…) is to adapt and strengthen Europe’s global health policy strategy to better align it with One Health priorities and the (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (…)
Post-coronavirus Europe Health for all And we have to talk One Voice On global governance for health.
Among the many speeches at the WHS Berlin event, former Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, who now serves as co-chair of the UN Advisory Council, said: Our Common Challenge At the United Nations he said:
The time for transformation of global health systems is now. We have suffered enough. Global action is now required.
UK participants included Jeremy Farrar, Chair of the Wellcome Trust, and Inger Ashing, CEO of Save the Children International. “It all starts and ends with the community. Without strong health systems that underpin it all, we cannot meet the challenges of tomorrow,” said Farrar, while Ashing reflected on the broader agenda of the Summit by saying:
COVID-19, climate change, conflict and the resulting rising cost of living are affecting children at every level, with those most affected by inequality and discrimination hitting them the hardest. We are experiencing a global child rights crisis.
The term “inequality” in the global jargon of the corona era means that somewhere in the world, some children are not vaccinated at all or are not vaccinated enough. This is a superficial concern even though infants, children and teenagers are essentially at zero risk of contracting corona, as Del Bigtree, a vaccine skeptic and founder of the Informed Consent Action Network, announced in his Sunday speech at the latest Red Pill Expo, held in Utah on November 12-13. In a powerful speech outlining the criminal side of the vaccine industry, Bigtree showed that the dangers of vaccines, known or suspected, go far beyond the corona “vaccines” created by Pfizer, Moderna and other government-protected companies, and cited various data to show that there is no scientific basis for vaccinating infants and children with any kind of corona vaccine.
To take one example, according to the Brownstone Institute, the COVID-19 death rate for 0-19 year olds in the U.S. is 0.0003%, with a 99.9997% survival rate. Bigtree also noted that in 1986, U.S. children received 11 vaccinations in their first four years of life, but by 2017 that number had risen to 54 among infants and teenagers (and some specific vaccines require multiple doses). But today, Bigtree, citing research by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., said: Protecting Children's HealthAlong with other sources, he offered a pessimistic outlook that the public in the U.S. and other countries will face huge pressure from Big Pharma and governments that tend to be dominated by the pharmaceutical industry to administer “hundreds of vaccinations.”
Given that specter, and the comments of pro-vaccine Israeli historian and World Economic Forum scholar Yuval Harari (quoted in the Red Pill Expo) that anticipate real-time surveillance of humanity not just from the outside of the skin but also “below the skin” via medical nanotechnology, with people’s vital signs and other aspects of their health monitored virtually nonstop, the adoption of a pandemic treaty by a sufficiently wide range of countries could mean a tyranny far more deadly than any pathogen could ever be.
