Medical crimes, or “medical crimes”'is a crime that involves a wide range of unlawful and illegal activities across different communities and different settings, including those in the medical profession. Discussing what medical crimes actually are can raise even more questions.
Historically, there has been a lot of discussion, media coverage, and legislation regarding street drug crime, online illegal drug purchases, and counterfeit medicines. However, this article seeks to draw attention to a crime that has remained in the shadows and open to interpretation.
We watch as highly qualified medical professionals advocate, manage, and encourage us all to be injected with experimental solutions and swallow experimental genomic medicine at “warp speed.” As I watched, no Given long-term safety data (or in some cases no safety data at all), it is clear that medical professionals can intentionally and knowingly continue to administer, prescribe, recommend, or inject substances about which they have no knowledge. You need to ask yourself if it is ethical and legal. Ingredients and contraindications, possible consequences and side effects for patients.
no matter what the outcome Serious injury It no longer seems to be a priority as legal compensation for both manufacturers and medical professionals is paramount. Without fear of being sued, vaccinators appear to operate with impunity, while the uninformed public assumes the risks and responsibilities. As we enter an era of blamelessness, let us ask ourselves why.
family doctor
In a letter to me in early 2022, featured in UK Column News, Dr Michael Mulholland, honorary secretary of the Royal College of General Practitioners, wrote:
GPs are unable to provide long-term information about side effects and the exact ingredients of vaccines because that information is not available.
So are all GPs committing medical crimes in their COVID-19 vaccination work? What information should they know before agreeing to administer the vaccine to an unsuspecting patient? Should they? Few people would be willing to give up their arm or career for a jab they know could change them or, worse, end their lives. Yet we continue to see doctors following this narrative.
The General Medical Council, the UK's medical registrar, states: Appropriate medical practicestates that drugs and treatments (including repeat prescriptions) should only be prescribed by a physician who has sufficient knowledge of the patient's health and is satisfied that the prescription will meet the patient's needs. . Physicians should never allow their own interests to influence or influence how they prescribe to patients. The principle of informed consent requires physicians to fully explain to patients why a proposed drug is recommended and what side effects and treatment effects are expected.
As of this writing, doctors cannot do any of the above.
One in five clinical negligence claims against doctors are related to medication errors. These errors cost the UK £750 million a year, with inappropriate prescribing and serious adverse events being the main causes. Physicians are usually subject to medical malpractice claims when their negligent actions cause harm to patients. The doctor's actions and subsequent consequences are usually the determining factor in whether a prescription constitutes a crime.
For medical malpractice to be held accountable at the criminal level, prosecutors must be able to prove that the medical provider's actions met all the necessary standards (cumulative evidence). Typically, these crimes involve the actions of medical professionals who enrich themselves through some type of medical procedure.
Medical serial killers can disappear for years, exploiting and influencing the elderly and vulnerable. Sometimes considered angels of mercy, they often believe they are working in the best interests of their patients. Doctors and nurses are some of the most trusted members of our society, so it is inconceivable that they would want to kill a patient.
Although patient murderers are relatively rare as a percentage of doctors, there are countless examples around the world, including in the UK. Dr. Harold Shipman was a general practitioner and is considered one of the most prolific serial killers in modern history, with an estimated 250 victims. We may never know his final death toll.
The coronavirus pandemic has seen a mass exodus from the NHS, leaving nurses and doctors in distress. burnout syndromecompassion fatigue and post-traumatic stress were cited as factors in resignation. A study identified the emotional states experienced by doctors who committed suicide. Recent US research As:
- Landscapes of death and poor care
- Systemic challenges and self-preservation
- mental fatigue
- unhelpful support
Dealing with side effects
So was the nurse. deeply affected They report being forever changed by what they went through and by the impact of Covid-19. a Survey conducted in Ontario in 2012 The researchers found that pharmacists who were given upgraded permission to administer vaccinations did indeed embrace this new role, but the impact on pharmacists' workloads and their knowledge of pain and fear associated with injections was significant. We conclude that further research is needed to examine the perception of
This vaccination role should require personal familiarity with the medical history of each patient presenting for vaccination, as well as knowledge of expected side effects should serious adverse reactions occur upon administration. did. We must not forget that the vast majority of the UK population was vaccinated by masked strangers whom they had never met before and who were not even told their names or professional status.
According to data from the UK's medicines regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), there are currently more than 464,000 reports of serious side effects after receiving a coronavirus vaccine. UK Column now searchable on website. Each of these injections is administered by someone. those someoneIf you read the law honestly, it appears that you could be complicit in a medical crime and be found guilty. However, the MHRA Criminal Enforcement Team appears to think otherwise, with reports reaching UK columns from around the world that healthcare workers administering coronavirus vaccines have been guaranteed full immunity by state prosecutors.
In the UK, medicines are only approved if they meet strict safety and quality standards. The MHRA strives to ensure that medicines approved to treat people in the UK are as safe as possible and follow rigorous safety testing. Andy Mooring, head of the MHRA's Criminal Enforcement Unit, said:
It is a crime to sell controlled medicines, unlicensed medicines, or prescription-only medicines without proper authorization.
That is, it is a drug that has not yet been used. Authorized for use by the MHRA In terms of safety, effectiveness, and quality, it is not welcome on our shores. This enforcement could be seen as the MHRA working with big pharmaceutical companies and charities such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to completely control and monitor the public's behavior.
MHRA Board of Directors, June 21, 2022, featured just after the hour on the June 23 episode of UK Column News 1 in 10 people in the UK buy illegal drugs from online websites It became clear. The current surge in online purchases may be partly due to patients not being able to visit their GPs to pick up their prescriptions, or their GPs not prescribing them.
Steel ring instead of reflection
The intention of the MHRA Criminal Enforcement Unit is to install physical and virtual 'iron rings' across the UK to keep British consumers 'safe' from illegal suppliers. Rather than looking domestically to acknowledge the devastation being caused by British medical professionals calling the MHRA state of emergency on millions of people in the UK, the Criminal Enforcement Agency has decided that the MHRA is under 99 % appear to be prioritizing these illegal websites which they admit are located outside the UK. Use an approved Covid-19 “vaccine”.
Is the MHRA studying its own database of serious side effects to Covid-19 vaccines? Do they care? Never before in history had so many serious adverse reactions been reported in such a short period of time, but the MHRA still said: “There is nothing to see or worry about here, please move on.'' Please,” he insists.
The MHRA has said it will collect information from a variety of sources and private partners in further attempts to instill confidence in the public. The agency prides itself on getting its intelligence from other government departments, and describes its external colleagues as “heavy hitters” in intelligence, extending its understanding across UK law enforcement to diverse areas such as terrorism and children. Overlay standard risk assessment models used to prioritize relevant themes. Sexual abuse. These are all areas in which Andy Mooring, MHRA's head of criminal enforcement, has previous experience.
Medical crime is big business. Council of Europe Convention on Counterfeiting of Medical Products and Similar Offenses Involving a Threat to Public Health (also known as medical crimes convention) is an international criminal law convention of the Council of Europe (a body with a much broader membership than the European Union) that deals with counterfeiting of medicines and medical devices.
The main objectives of the Convention are to criminalize certain acts, protect the rights of victims, and promote national and international cooperation. Counterfeiting of medical products and similar crimes pose a threat to many countries due to the low level of deterrence provided by domestic and international laws. The Convention is the world's only international legal instrument to combat counterfeit medical products and is a milestone in tackling transnational organized crime. international alert May be filed for medical crimes.
The MHRA continues to strengthen its position on medical crime, labeling it as the culprit, despite working with major companies such as Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna and GlaxoSmithKline to commit the biggest medical crime in history We're going to give priority to people outside the country.
The 'ring of steel' has been tightened and soon British citizens will only have access to new, untested (100 day mission) genomic medicines approved by the MHRA, and no generic medicines from overseas. So who is the MHRA? Is the enabler now agencies, as CEO Dame June Laing proudly declared? Are you a professional public corporation? Safety regulator? Or a guild of legalized snake oil merchants? Partly owned and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Big Pharma, the MHRA is unchallenged, unregulated, unaccountable, and transparently committed to medical crimes. Seems like he has the ability to do it. How long will our Congress allow this to continue?
The MHRA believes that they, the watchdogs of the pharmaceutical panopticon, are in control and that we, the prisoners, cannot see it at work. Their bosses don't realize that while they weren't looking, the situation was reversed and now we're watching them.
