British Member of Parliament Andrew Bridden Stop Conservative Party Because he questioned the “safety and effectiveness” of so-called COVID-19 vaccines — completely unrelated to the plausible claims that he is an anti-Semite or racist.
But it was a hoax spread to marginalize him, and those involved in the smear campaign had no respect for the memory of the Jews and others murdered in the Holocaust.
In the hands of virtue-preaching politicians and the mainstream media, words The Holocaust and Anti-Semitism It is stripped of meaning and loses all meaningful significance in the mouth.
For a significant group of establishment figures and mainstream media representatives, The Holocaust and Anti-Semitism These are merely rhetorical weapons used to persecute and ostracize opponents and silence critics. It is a sickening irony that these sacred words in our language are co-opted by those who seek to “otherize” those they clearly despise.
The use of deceptive language as propaganda is nothing new, nor is the inversion of morality. vinegarhandling (Special treatment) Using euphemisms pictureend (Final solution) Hide The terrifying reality Of the Holocaust.
Bridgens The unpleasant tweetConveniently attacked by those who apparently will not tolerate any questions about the jab, they wrote:
As one cardiologist told me, this is the greatest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.
The working definition of anti-Semitism is International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) is clear:
Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jewish people that may be expressed as hatred towards Jewish people. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism may be directed against Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, Jewish community institutions and religious sites.
The IHRA gives examples of anti-Semitism to illustrate how it affects people.
Mr. Bridden has said nothing that could legitimately be called “anti-Semitic.”
The IHRA also Distortion of the HolocaustThis, whether intentionally or unintentionally, excuses, minimises or misrepresents the known historical record of the Holocaust.
Again, Andrew Bridgen has not said or published anything that could be construed as a distortion of the Holocaust. However, Matt Hancock and Rishi Sunak In any case, they condemned him. For them, the IHRA definition is completely irrelevant. Apparently, they are among those who don't care what history tells us about the Holocaust or what real anti-Semitism is.
Mr Sunak and Mr Hancock have baselessly linked medicine scepticism to anti-Semitism – a term they have shamelessly abused. Anti-Semitism This is to score easy political points by defending multinational corporations and the failure of their own policies.
of The mainstream media has pounced Hancock, Snack, and Other politiciansThey all seem to willfully misunderstand what anti-Semitism means. Similarly, they all say that the question for pharmaceutical companies is A kind of radicalization processThis is despite the fact that their claims about so-called radicalization have no evidential basis whatsoever.
Bridgen's original tweet Referred to the article First published by Professor Josh GoetzkowAccording to those attacking Bridden, a senior lecturer at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, citing the work of prominent Jewish scholars is “anti-Semitic.”
Professor Goetzkow reported on an analysis of official data from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) published by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which revealed truly alarming safety signals that have been completely ignored by US, UK and EU regulators.
Professor Getsuko pointed out:
CDC's VAERS safety signal analysis of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (…) shows clear safety signals regarding deaths and a range of very concerning thromboembolic, cardiac, neurological, bleeding, hematologic, immune system, and menstrual adverse events (AEs) in U.S. adults. (…) The safety signals cannot be dismissed as being due to “sensationalized,” exaggerated, fraudulent, or otherwise artificially inflated reports, nor can they be dismissed due to the sheer number of COVID vaccines administered.
Yet safety signals are summarily dismissed by regulators, politicians and mainstream media around the world. It doesn't matter how talented or prominent the voices questioning vaccination are: any opposition leads to a coordinated and concerted attack by the pro-pharmaceutical establishment, often using rhetorical tricks and logical fallacies.
People like Hancock and Sunak exploit anti-Semitic concepts Strawman Argument Designed for Appealing to emotions It is a despicable attempt to distract from the real safety concerns raised by Mr Bridgen, Professor Getzkow and many others. The mainstream media is doing exactly the same thing, casting their net over anyone else who questions vaccinations or government policy itself.
to call Refuse the jab Blaming them for being “rejectors” liedenying them Employment opportunitiesDenied access without a jab Public spaces and servicesThose who don't want to get an injection are calledbaby murdererAnd finally, the obvious object of hatred Terrorist extremists To justify Use of violence With them, we have seen such social and moral breakdowns before. We know exactly what kind of people manipulate these narratives, why they do it, and the nature of the people who follow their orders no matter how vile they may be.
Busy August 2022“We are deeply sorry for this,” said Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor and founder of the Alliance to Protect Human Research.
The Holocaust did not begin in the gas chambers of Auschwitz and Treblinka. (…) The stage was set by propaganda that incited fear and hatred. (…) To prevent another Holocaust, we must identify the sinister parallels of the present before they contaminate the fabric of society. (…) By government decree, doctors remain prohibited from prescribing life-saving FDA-approved drugs, and government-mandated procedures continue to kill. The media is silent – as it was then. The media broadcasts a single government-mandated narrative, just as they did under the Nazi regime. Strict censorship silences dissenting voices. (…) This time, the threat of genocide is global. This time, instead of Zyklon B gas, the weapons of mass destruction are genetically modified injectable biological weapons disguised as vaccines.
There is mounting evidence suggesting that vaccinations can cause serious health problems and death, while there is an unwillingness to acknowledge safety concerns. Yet there is a blanket refusal to research and the mainstream media broadcasts a single government-driven narrative that completely denies the evidence. When public figures like Bridden speak out, they are attacked, ridiculed and “dissenting voices” are silenced. The “ominous parallels” to the Holocaust could not be clearer.
Famous Scientists and medical professionals A growing number of statisticians, people harmed by vaccines and others are highlighting legitimate concerns and seeking answers. Reasonable and well-founded questions “Incite hatred Advertising” “.
Without thorough research into the harm a vaccine may cause, there is no basis to claim that the vaccine is “safe and effective.” Safety signals clearly indicate that the vaccine is a potentially dangerous drug, and it has been administered to an estimated 100,000 people. 5.5 billion people.
Given the current evidence and the questionable willingness of authorities to take it into account, a cynical response to COVID-19 is certainly did it It would be “the greatest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.” There's good reason why Bridgen's tweet referenced the horror of the Holocaust.
Mr Sunak, Mr Hancock and others have subsequently obfuscated and downplayed the significance of Mr Bridden's words – they have immorally twisted them and falsely accused him of anti-Semitism, thus downplaying the important social and historical context of these words and tarnishing a monumental term with a watered-down slur.
International Holocaust Remembrance Day It was created by the United Nations to “honor the victims of Nazism.” Those who blatantly misuse the original meaning of the term are Anti-Semitism They only dishonor the victim. They should be thoroughly ashamed of their actions, but that requires intellectual honesty and moral integrity. Do they have either?
