This article addresses the concerns and criticisms raised by UK Column members about my article. Article published on September 15th Scottish Public Information Update: COVID-19 frontline deaths by occupation (This is an updated version of my original article, Scottish Freedom of Information: Zero Covid deaths among working-age people with most contact with the public between 2020 and 2022).
Point 1
Subscribers to the UK column have warned that some parts of the article are incorrect. all UK doctors have been crippled by “Long Covid”. This is a valid criticism of the following part of the article:
One in five doctors in the UK is disabled due to 'long corona'
As of August 31, 2023, New research shows 20% of doctors in the UK are unable to work due to “Long Corona”, but in Scotland where I live no In 2020, a doctor actually died from a viral infection.
I never said that all UK doctors were incapacitated due to “Long Covid”, but I think I could have made it clearer in my writing that 20% of doctors were incapacitated. People who have been diagnosed with “Long Covid” and have been unable to return to work; And it's not all Doctor.
I thank the member of the UK Column for pointing this out.
Point 2
Another UK column subscriber responded to a section of my update titled “Frontline 2023 conclusions” and found it misleading. Study shows harm from coronavirus vaccine for German health workers It's not Scotland, which is true, but I don't think it's misleading.
The inference I have drawn here is a reasonable one: the German population received the same COVID-19 vaccines from the same manufacturers (Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Moderna) as the Scottish population, so why would they experience the same level of harm? do not have I believe that the country of origin of this study is not particularly relevant to some Scottish healthcare professionals. This section might be easier to read if it was written as follows:
For example, in a September 2023 survey From Germany It has been shown that 35% of 1,704 registered health workers had to take sick leave after being “vaccinated” against Covid-19, with sick leave increasing significantly with each subsequent booster vaccination.
This article was published in late 2023, so given its recent timing and the fact that we know a lot more about side effects than we do in 2021, I felt it supported the growing perception that healthcare workers are getting sick from the Covid “vaccine”.
Thanks to UK column readers for providing this feedback.
Point 3
Another UK Column subscriber thought that using annual data to support the harm of Covid “vaccines” was not as accurate as using monthly data, and I agree wholeheartedly, but I can only write about data I received under the Freedom of Information Act, which in this case was broken down by year.
I am simply pointing out that in many cases, the year following large-scale “vaccination” against “Covid-19” there is often an increase in “Covid” deaths and deaths from all causes. The data I requested and received is only per year, so that is all I can work with. I take some umbrage at this point, as using a monthly data set would no doubt be a more accurate way to determine the positive and negative effects of a Covid “vaccine.” As of late 2023, I have some of this data in my possession and will share it in due course.
I also believe the article is clear regarding the classification of what constitutes a “Covid” death (see diagram below) – i.e. whether a particular death will be registered as a “Covid-related” death, or whether it has Covid as an underlying cause, or is a direct result of Covid (without any known underlying conditions).
