Marine Le Pen, former president of the National Rally (NR) party and vice president of the French National Assembly, has been found guilty of embezzling EU funds. She was sentenced to four years in prison. Half of that was to be suspended, and the other half was to be spent under house arrest. Most importantly, she has been forbidden from serving in public office for five years, and she has banned her from running in the 2027 presidential election.
Whether Le Pen is guilty or not is irrelevant here. Corruption is very present in the politics of France and the European Union. Importantly, embarrassingly for the globalist ruling class, her NR party won the highest vote in the first round of the 2024 legislative election. Panic hit Macron, he had to round out the unlikely coalition to prevent her from winning, and spent months finding a prime minister he could accept. He ultimately chose Michel Bernier, the embodiment of the establishment of globalists and the former EU Brexit negotiator, whose Republicans won less than 7% of the vote. The presidential election was held in 2027, and NR Lead the vote Regarding the intention of voting. Against this background, it is not difficult to see Marine Le Pen's true crimes as her popularity in the eyes of many disillusioned French voters.
Globalists always know that the majority of “normal” people do not support globalism, including the exclusion of nation-states and national identity, large-scale migration, and government exclusion. This inconvenient reality was driven rudely when Trump was elected president of the United States in 2016 and Brexit won the UK referendum. Unexpected outcome It sparked the acceleration of a long-term project to establish a new world order. This can be at risk if a large strip of society awakens to what is planned for them and decides to do something about it.
There are two ways to avoid this unpleasant and unforeseen situation. One is the radical, rapid and bloody implementation of a complete dictatorship of the kind enforced in Central and Eastern Europe known as the “Eastern Region” by the West after World War II. The Yalta Agreement approved the Soviet occupation of this “Norman Land.” There, the puppet government took power through the occupying forces, quickly eliminating traces of democracy and freedom. The massive nationalization of private property, the forced implementation of unrealistic economic models, complete national control over all aspects of life, censorship and surveillance, and brutal and bloody crackdowns on all attempts to resist or mitigate disasters have become a “new reality.” It was a huge reset for these unfortunate colonized countries. The dictatorship lasted for 45 years until the withdrawal of Soviet troops during the occupation in 1990.
This type of solution is quick and effective, but is more difficult to implement in western societies after 80 years of relative prosperity than in the eastern countries. Don't forget about the psychological aspects too. Society is (literally) beaten by slavery is more difficult to control in the long term than society that unconsciously slips into it.
A better solution appears to be an accelerated implementation of the New World Order, at least for now, while maintaining the similarities of democracy. This has been largely reduced anyway, and a group of people who are struggling with economic misery, the disappearance of their culture, and the constant threat of illness, war and thought may find it more difficult to fight back.
One way to ensure that a project is progressing is to neutralize political forces that may oppose or slow down a major reset. This can be done in several ways, from revolutions of colour to creating internal conflicts among the opposition, to political parties' cooperation, that is, weaponizing laws for political purposes. The latter is a Long years of practice It has gained popularity in recent years. It is enough to think about countless lawsuits against President Donald Trump, accusations against Italian deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, or the recent lawsuit of Romanian Karin Georgik, who won the first round of last year's presidential election, but his outcome has been acquitted and he is banned from standing again in the election. Former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton proudly announced this in January.We did it in Romania and obviously we do it in GermanyIf necessary, please refer to the German elections in February this year.
Marine Le Pen is now being wiped out of political maps. This has the double advantage of removing dangerous opposition figures, and even a system of direct presidential elections is potentially unlocked when enough populations are disillusioned to refrain from voting. The political class opposed the introduction of a direct popularity vote for the president in 1962. During the Parliamentary debate on October 4, 1962, Rep. Raymondre Solegerist gave a brief summary of their reasons.
I want to say something that some people don't want to admit in public, and they do. They do not believe that people are well educated, fully confident, or even intelligence enough to elect the president of the Republic.
Nevertheless, the long-term effects of Le Pen's exclusion are not clear. She intends to appeal and also seeks a presidential pardon. There may be enough domestic rage and international condemnation to force a change in her legal status. Globalist thought leaders show a The growing recognition that her beliefs could actually strengthen Europe's “right edge” and populism. Even if she is forbidden from political life, the verdict produces a great deal of sympathy for her, and the resulting backlash can help Jordan Bardera, the young president of RN, to strengthen his position or even win the next election.
This is a really interesting point about the situation. One way to maintain power over an institution, especially if the position is vulnerable, is to employ dangerously popular opposition parties. For decades, Marine Le Pen has been working to “accept” her party by keeping her distance from her father and removing the “father-right” and “Xenophobe” epithets. She has eased her stance on many economic and political issues, from demanding a referendum on euro drops and flexit to immigration and same-sex marriage. She presided over a language that refers to the considerable Muslim population of France. Furthermore, she approaches the neoliberal economic order of governance, seeking advice and approval. Large companies. This helped her solidify her party's position, and became somewhat embraced by the Liberal Party as a large group of voters disillusioned with mainstream parties headed towards a “outsider” party that cannot be burdened with disappointing records.
The international context is advantageous as Trump's presidency has given him promotion to most right-wing political forces. RN leaders may be more adapting to Trump's priorities and becoming more visible.
They have already taken some steps. In March, Bardera traveled to Jerusalem to attend an international conference on the fight against Israeli anti-Semitism. The meeting itself became controversial as several Jewish invitees cancelled their participation in protests against the invitations of politicians, considered by the liberal political community as “a difficult right.” Bardella's presence certainly sparked some hostility, but his statement may make him more welcome in the future. he I said:
In the face of an unsettling revival of anti-Semite hatred across Europe and the world, and terrorism that intends to destroy our lives and our values, we believe that French more than ever has to bring their country together their voices and join forces in the fight… I recognize the symbolic importance of the invitation here, and the responsibility to my party, and the responsibility for our war.
The previous “far-right” party maintains the narrative, but in reality it becomes much more calm and accepting the axioms of the ruling order may be an attractive alternative to its establishment, especially in a disturbed era. Hillary Clinton prefers to be called a patriotic “normal” citizen, wants to stop immigration, stimulate the national economy, and regain sovereignty, and is willing to follow the leaders who provide such programs. President Trump was seen as dragged by a courtroom exposed to kamarun, attacks and unimaginable hostility by his political opponents, but he now has a huge amount of sympathy and support that have almost free hands to implement his policies without much scrutiny or opposition. Marine Le Pen's ordeal may make her party popular enough to do the same.
It's fascinating to see how the NR rotates.
