Are treaties in place for something that governments expect will rarely happen?
Following his recent One Health article, Mark Anderson reveals: 32 page zero draft (February 1, 2023) International legal instrument intended by the World Health Organization regarding pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. In parallel, WHO's proposed power-centralizing amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) were submitted to a Geneva working group in late February.
Like other UK column authors and interviewees, he agrees with the WHO's intended pandemic treaty. international health regulationsMark Anderson has elucidated that the worldview of the people who make up these earth-control mechanisms is that humans are an asset class on a par with rodents and algae.
in Rise of a scientific dictatorship, Bad influence of treatment What was promoted by WHO funders and national policy makers is dismissed as anecdote. Mark aptly states:
Scientism has no separation of religion and state.
Hear from Mark how it goes. give and take away The clean-sounding language of one section on a state's national sovereignty is cleverly canceled out in a subsequent section that preaches the primacy of “obligations to international law.”
This isn't a new trick either. The 1976 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights has similar provisions. Article to declare That we are free except when we are not. In the ahistorical and unhealthy human rights model of freedom, virtually all rights are qualified rights.
