Despite the available evidence, there are those who still propagate the belief that discussions about establishing world governance are just one of many conspiracy theories that are corrupting our society. For those skeptics, click on the link below to listen to Tory Ann Milton MP, Minister of Public Health, speak on “Public Health: New Directions.” She says public health is a key priority for the Coalition Government. In summary, she told the audience that too much alcohol, too much tobacco, too much food, and not enough exercise are creating a “perfect storm of ill health and inequality.” She claims:
Stepping outside the medical definition of public health…
She went on to tell us:
On really big issues, common purpose can transcend political boundaries. We have no intention of reversing the ban (and) have decided not to proceed with the planned review.
Any right-thinking person will wonder why such an unpopular policy is not being reviewed, when it has already been confirmed that the NHS is undergoing a review. £21 billion was wasted on tackling health inequalities. “at least, 35,000 police stations will be abolished and 4 out of 10 courts will be closed. For future budget cuts. 'But it doesn't end there. in progress Ministry of Defense cuts Previous reports also included that the UK may have to take the following steps: rent a plane from America Take off from our new aircraft carrier. of telegraph The new plan would reduce the number of British warships to just 25, with frigates, destroyers, submarines, minesweepers and all amphibious craft scrapped. ”
Information that has largely escaped media attention and thus fallen under the “public radar” includes the following facts (this is an important topic that I will explore soon):
Although the above expenditures occurred when NuLabour was under 'monitoring', recent news releases suggest that the situation is unlikely to change under the NuCoalition. For example, Prime Minister David Cameron has already visited a Common Purpose event in Bangalore, and William Hague hosted a Common Purpose leadership development course in Ankara, Turkey, in July 2010. .
There is a clear lack of transparency and openness regarding the past and present influence of non-governmental organizations, including Common Purpose and Demos, on state institutions and the national government itself. Of further interest to discerning British column readers is the fact that on August 23, 1947, the first international conference of the World Movement for a World Federal Government issued the following statement: . Montreux Declaration. This declaration called for
“Mobilize the peoples of the world to put pressure on national governments and legislative assemblies to increase the powers and resources of the United Nations agencies and transform them into a world federal government by amending the Charter of the United Nations.”
Includes the goals stated in the Montreux Declaration
- Direct enforcement of world law, no matter who the individual is or where they live.
- Disarmament to the level of internal security requirements of member states.
When cross-referencing with the Monteux Declaration, one has to wonder whether what was proposed is: MOD budget will be cut in 2010 The planning took a long time.
Federalists lead us to a government of words
In my previous article, I directed readers to the next page. House of Lords debate in 1953 Regarding the topic of the World Federation. It's worth repeating here. The discussion began as follows.
In the opinion of this House, it is Her Majesty's Government to aim for the development of the United Nations into a world federation open to all nations, with limited and limited powers sufficient to support, strengthen and maintain the United Nations. Achieving peace and preventing aggression through the establishment, interpretation, and enforcement of world law should be the fundamental objective of the country's foreign policy.
During that debate, Lord Birdwood is recorded as saying:
We are far from the day when British people will accept laws set in Europe on British soil. Still, the seeds of ultimate success in presenting the blueprint of the plan to the world's peoples, making them understand its meaning, and accepting it with common consent lie in (this) more measured approach. I see that there is. There is no risk that all of us will one day wake up and find ourselves subject to an international system that we neither approved nor understood.
One World Governance deniers should also note that in 1953 Lord Silkin also said:
Some of us who are members of the World Government Movement (and I have been since its founding) believe that all of this can be achieved through the structure of United Nations agencies.
On September 9, a FoxNews report said the United Nations was about to take charge of the global agenda. The report states:
After a year of humiliating setbacks, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and about 60 of his top officials (from the top of the entire UN system) spent Labor Day weekend at a secluded resort in the Austrian Alps. We talked about how to get our vast tracts of land back. An organization in charge of the world agenda. Details about the two-day closed session, which took place in the welcoming village of Alpbach, were kept closely guarded.
Nevertheless, a brief from the meeting obtained by FOX News indicates that the agenda included:
— How to restore climate change to the world's top priority following the fiasco of last year's Copenhagen summit.
— How can we continue our efforts to make global wealth redistribution a real cornerstone of the climate change agenda and further expand the discussion to include the idea of a “global public good”? –
– How can we continue to expand UN peacekeeping operations to cover police forces, courts, legal systems, and other aspects of war-torn countries?
— How to harness the global trend of migration from poorer countries to richer countries to encompass a new “international migration governance framework.''
— How to “smartly” use new technologies to deepen direct relationships with what the United Nations calls “civil society,” bypassing member states and dealing directly with constituencies that support U.N. policies. It means new ways of doing things…The heads of the United Nations often seemed to be struggling with how to deal with the thorny issue of national sovereignty. According to the opinion, this problem continues to thwart many of the most ambitious plans, especially when it comes to different types of national sovereignty. “Global Governance”.
This not only suggests that for more than 50 years, this and past governments have treated voters as an endless series of thugs and idiots.
