I have heard about it Sexual rightsProbably not, but don't be embarrassed by your apparent ignorance – they don't actually exist!
“Sexual rights” is endlessly repeated and constantly alluded to by the WHO, the UN and countless campaigning groups, including Amnesty International. Special web pages about them— but not defined What are theyBy government mandate, schoolchildren in Scotland are being taught about their “sexual rights” – but the message is essentially that minors have the right to engage in illegal sexual activity.
So how have these vague sexual rights been crystallized in the international debate on sexuality? In part, it is because radical sexuality and gender activists have projected their own values and priorities onto real (theoretically) existing rights, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Of course, the UN has made little noise about the abuse of these rights, because it is more or less aligned with the radical activists.
IPPF: Proposed Definer
Sexual rights are often mentioned as if they were based on a genuine international treaty, but what exactly are they? International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) decided to step in and create their own so-called sexual rights.
Before we look at what they've concocted, let's be clear about what the IPPF is. As an international abortion business, the London-based IPPF has been embroiled in allegations of fraud and misconduct. Prostitutes for staff and donorsIn addition to its core business, the company strongly promotes a highly permissive ideology regarding sexual relations, particularly among young people.
This is the background. Next, IPPF the Simple sexual rights.
The preamble starts to ring alarm bells, even before the rights themselves are mentioned.
It is important that all young people around the world are able to explore, experience and express their sexuality in healthy, positive, fun and safe ways – this can only be achieved if their sexual rights are guaranteed.
“All” young people? Of all ages? Everyone, regardless of age, has the right to explore, experience, and express their sexuality in pleasurable ways? This seems to negate the concept of age of consent laws, but let's not jump to conclusions.
As you read on, you'll discover:
The sexual rights of young people are different from and more complex than those of adults. One reason for this is that young people's sexual rights are widely denied. There is a common misconception that young people are not, or should not be, sexual beings, except for certain groups, such as married young people or young people over a certain age. Sexual rights are a central aspect of being human, at all stages of each person's life.
That is really conclusive evidence. IPPF opposes the idea that there should be an age limit on child sexual activity.
Because each young person develops at their own pace, there is no universal age at which certain sexual rights and protections become or become less important, so the balance between protection and autonomy should be based on each young person's evolving capabilities.
Thus, while IPPF recognises that some children are too young to consent to sexual activity, it believes that decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis, assessing the capacity of each individual child. So, for example, having sex with a six-year-old is not automatically illegal and amounts to statutory rape. Maturity Of that 6 year old child.
We might respond that six-year-olds are in a pre-sexual stage of development and therefore are incapable of understanding or experiencing sexuality in any meaningful sense.
IPPF opposes this:
For young people of all ages around the world, sexuality is a central part of being human.
That is, sexuality is seen as central to babies, toddlers, and children.
in fact,
All young people have the right to sexual happiness and pleasure.
Total and Real
When we look into the so-called “rights” themselves, we find the following:
All young people have the right to privacy and to make personal, autonomous decisions about their sexual orientation.
This is the doctrine that a child who decides to have sex with anyone has the right to keep that secret. Thus, any adult who has sex with a child can remind the child that he or she has a “right” to keep it a secret from others. Other adults who report sexual relations between adults and children can be prosecuted for violating this right. right.
Any restrictions on sexual rights must not be discriminatory, including on grounds of age.
Just to be clear, children have a “right” to be free from age of consent laws. right Grant:
Empower them to freely decide when, with whom, and how they have sex.
Apparently,
Every young person has the right to the highest attainable standards of physical and mental health and well-being.
After the IPPF told children they could have sex with whoever they wanted and at whatever age they felt ready, The right to good mental healthThat's like giving children cigarettes and telling them they have the right to healthy lungs.
Needless to say, IPPF believes that children have a right to comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) – this is exactly the embodiment of the values we have seen so far.
Returning to the story, we see how Scottish schoolchildren came to be taught about their “right” to have illegal sexual relations with minors.
Finally, let's just put things as they are. According to these “sexual rights,” a pedophile, after seducing a child, can say to her: “If you want, and if you think you're ready, you have the right to have sex with me, and you also have the right to keep it a secret between the two of us.”
Every time you hear the words “sexual rights,” immediately translate it in your mind as “the right of a child to not be sexually abused.” That's what it means. Anyone who wants to have sex with a child would welcome this so-called sexual right, but every sensible person who cares about protecting children should be horrified.
