In the ultimate transhumanist world, humans, or at least some humans, would be able to control every aspect of their lives and be “free” from the constraints of nature. Therefore, such people try to control every aspect of our life. For this purpose, divide and conquer is necessary, and the most basic divide and conquer is the destruction of the family unit.
Part I is here.
The traditional family unit is where we learn our identity. When the family unit is broken, we are less likely to identify with ourselves because we have no solid foundation to fall back on. Therefore, we have no choice but to look to the world outside of media and popular culture for self-identification. Destroying the family unit places the birth and development of children in the hands of the state, but it also creates confusion about who we are. This is the perfect breeding ground for transhumanism.
There are many ways in which a family unit can be disrupted, but this particular article focuses on the transhumanist agenda regarding sexuality and how our sexuality can and is being altered to better fit this agenda. Continuing from the previous article by considering: By changing the way we perceive ourselves as human beings.
Heterosexuality has formed the basis of civilization and the family for as long as humans have existed. Although it can be said that homosexuality has been practiced in various cultures since the beginning of recorded history, its acceptance is a relatively new concept for Christianity, the religion that has made the overwhelming contribution to culture and faith up to this century. Christianity has always opposed homosexuality, even though this country (like almost every other country in the Western world) has many preachers and prelates participating in homosexual activities. Although we will not discuss the hypocrisy of the clergy here, it is still important to note the change and acceptance of homosexuality by the clergy. christian culturewhich has been practiced in the Western world for almost 1700 years, shows that change and acceptance did not occur gradually, but in fact rather suddenly. This suggests that there is a driving force behind this change. This is because cultures and customs, left to their own devices, exist unchanged for hundreds or even thousands of years.
Homosexuality, like cross-dressing men and women, is not new, but transsexualism, or people who seek to physically change their bodies to those of the opposite sex, is a concept that is receiving increasing attention in the media. Transgender and transsexual, like transhumanism, refer to individuals in transition. Regarding the former, it refers to people who psychologically identify with the opposite sex and who try to live as a member of the opposite sex by undergoing surgery or hormone therapy to change their body, especially as transhumans seek. Masu. Changing your body by integrating it with technology (all for different reasons).
There is There are many articles about transgender people. Similarly, the number of articles talking about (mainly) has also increased. Famous men who are currently or have become “women”. This is the next step towards transhumanism, which requires the gradual acceptance of people who have intentionally changed their bodies from their natural bodies.
People's opinions on sexuality have gradually changed from what is considered a traditional family view to what we see today. This progress really gained momentum with the free love movement of the 60s, which, as an offshoot, laid the foundations for tolerance of homosexuality and the right to be left alone. Remember, we are looking at a culture that has been primarily anti-gay for hundreds of years. After decades of gentle nudging, homosexuality has become not only accepted by society, but protected. Considering how mistreated homosexuals have been and how intolerant Christian culture has been in the past, this is a huge leap forward in just a few decades. But sadly, homosexuals are not liberated and in fact have been and continue to be used as stepping stones by agendas to persuade us to embrace transhumanism. Homosexuality can be seen as the first stepping stone away from what previous cultures considered the natural family and sexual union between the sexes, toward what was considered an unnatural division between the sexes.
Homosexuality has become accepted in Christian culture and is now Encouraged in schools for children as young as 4 years oldThis may be seen as an attempt to produce future generations who are more likely to fully accept the gay community and participate in it in some way.
Our personal opinions about homosexuality, or whether we think it should be taught to young children, are irrelevant to this discussion. The point here is that Christian culture has fundamentally changed in the last 20 years to the point where it is taught to four-year-olds in schools. This should be seen as evidence of social manipulation, whether it is for the better or not. Next you need to ask why this is happening.
As discussed in a previous article, the process of nudging a culture takes decades and often starts with marginalized groups, such as homosexuals, and is often done in the name of their rights being protected. . No individual or group should suppress the personal choices of others, but what is not known is that these rights are not promoted on behalf of individuals, but on public opinion and ultimately is being promoted to change the culture of the nation. Once the nudge process is successful and reaches the penultimate stage of promotion in schools and the general public, there is always the enactment of legislation that acts as a deterrent to prevent the culture from going 'backward'. In this case, it was the legalization of same-sex marriage.
Laws and policies ensure that anyone who opposes desired opinions or changes is punished. Such was the case at Penzance. Gay couple denied accommodation by Christian B&B owner. Mr. and Mrs. Bull are devout Christians who believe that unmarried couples should not share a bed (by the way, this applies to all couples, regardless of sexuality). However, in this case their right to religion was usurped by the couple's right to sexuality. Such high-profile incidents are used to make points and push society further toward desired goals by punishing those who disagree. Interestingly, although the gay couple denied the allegations, it was suggested at the time that they were part of a pressure group.
The ultimate goal is to create a world where humanity is created in a laboratory and owned and controlled by a small, elite group. People would have laughed at the idea of Aldous Huxley in 1932 when he published Brave New World, but in the 21st century we are rapidly accelerating toward his vision at an alarming rate.
There are countless articles to help you with the process, but most of them are based on stories from people with mental illness, learning disabilities, medical conditions, and of course failed pregnancies.Why create IVF babies in a lab? Justify what you need. But all this still involves the traditional family unit. With the acceptance of homosexuality in society, IVF could demonstrate that the union of a man and a woman is unnecessary by helping homosexual couples “create” their own children, thereby increasing society's acceptance of homosexuality. It calls for greater acceptance of family units that are neither traditional nor natural.
very high popularity Quarrel between Dolce & Gabbana and Elton Johnis a very good example of how celebrities are used to sway public opinion when it comes to synthetic babies. Whatever our opinion of Elton John, he and his music are “worshipped” by millions of people across the country and around the world. Regardless of whether people agree with Elton John and David Furnish, so many people appreciate Elton John's music that there is a tendency to sympathize or “leave the matter alone.” there will be. That's human nature. To accept Elton John's view, and therefore this particular issue, you must either accept the issue in general or accept that you are a hypocrite or ignorant.
Just to be clear, the resulting articles, and the campaigns and demonstrations that followed the media hype, were synthetic, designed to keep the noise going for as long and as loud as possible to force you home. Concentrating on baby approval. The acceptance of in vitro fertilization will one day pave the way for genetically modified designer babies.
The media that has succeeded in changing people's views on homosexuals, or more precisely the media that owns the big five media companies (ultimately all media), has in turn encouraged the public to accept transgender/transsexual people. He will try to persuade you. If successful, the public will more readily accept future plans to modify humanity and integrate it with technology, since there is no simple definition of what it means to be human. As a result, it will become increasingly difficult to determine what is natural and what is unnatural. Because to do so would be to violate that person's right to be who or whatever they choose.
