This is the second MHRA board meeting, published exclusively online by UK Column before being announced exclusively by the regulator YouTube channel. The previous limited edition, September 2022, is here (since uploaded (Visit MHRA's YouTube channel).
UK Column Nursing Correspondent Debi Evans' video report on the MHRA Board meeting for November 15, 2022 begins at 51:47 of the November 16 news episode.
Close scrutiny of the MHRAS is essential at this time, especially since drug developer Sasha Latipova is on record as saying: Western medical regulators have no contractual obligation to assess side effects Drug sales associated with market “liberalization”. her comment was made towards the end of her first 30 minutes Second interview with Jesse Zurawell (her first here). UK Column also interviewed Sasha.
exceeded expectations
On 15 November 2022 at 10am, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) held its monthly board meeting. Stephen Lightfoot, who was appointed in September 2020, has assumed the role of chair. He succeeds the post previously held by Lord Alasdair Breckenridge. Regular readers and readers of the UK column may remember that Dame June Laing, CEO of the MHRA, paid tribute to Sir Alasdair's pioneering work. yellow card system Meanwhile, in the same speech, he acknowledged that the number of reports of serious side effects from the COVID-19 shot was several times higher than the 100,000 people expected by authorities.
Mr. Lightfoot has a 30-year career in the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries. Whether this relates to a conflict of interest with his new role is a question that requires consideration.
The conference was attended by 127 people, including 25 from industry, 75 members of the public, four journalists, 16 MHRA staff, and seven medical staff. What the board may not have realized was that many of the members of the public listening in were people who had suffered vaccine injuries from COVID-19 shots. If they had known, they might have behaved more politely.
Throughout the 2 hour and 40 minute meeting, people with vaccine injuries were ignored and downplayed. References to people with vaccine injuries were trivialized, as if they were not real people. They were laughed at. Give your own testimony in this exclusive recording of the latest MHRA Board meeting. all Agency executives are wallowing in self-congratulation for what is presumably a job well done. As the champagne cools on ice (you can hear the Chief Technology Officer happily speaking at this meeting) claire harrison), the MHRA has admitted that severe side effects from the coronavirus jab were “distorted” throughout yellow card data and had to be removed from the overall data.
The Chief Executive's Report to the Board, written by Dame June Laing, is short and comprehensive and is provided at the beginning of the meeting. The agenda seems to be vaccines, more vaccines, and more vaccines. This month, she's also focused on cancer diagnosis, the gut microbiome, and the amazing life sciences at our fingertips. What she did not reveal was that the MHRA had just approved the addition of the latest childhood vaccines to the UK's already lengthy schedule. Vac Neuvence (PCVI5) is claimed to protect children (including healthy children) from pneumococcal disease.
Dr Alison Cave, MHRA Chief Safety Officer, said: safety connectthe agency's new “safety system” is contracted to last until 2027 (in layman's terms, that means barcoding). Dr Cave said all deaths due to Covid-19 'vaccination' were individually investigated by the MHRA. This is news to Britain Column's nursing correspondent Debi Evans, and to the many people who have tragically lost loved ones after getting the jab. A “pregnancy prevention plan” and a “patient advocate network” will be established, Dr. Cave said. Notably, a “medication compliance protocol” is also planned, and the agency's in-house behavioral scientist is also expected to be appointed soon. What can we expect from SPI-B (and now)? WHO) Will Professor Susan Mitchie be on the institution's next board meeting?
With MHRA employees continuing to retire, it is difficult to fill vacancies. Headhunting is at the top of the MHRA's list of priorities. According to Dr. Cave, there's no need for anyone to worry.
Lack of empathy?
MHRA executives are aware that they are being watched. But they seem to lack empathy, understanding, and sensitivity towards those injured by vaccines. Furthermore, they seem completely unaware that the MHRA's activities are being monitored by people whose lives have been destroyed by side effects from coronavirus vaccines, unless they simply don't care. Nursing correspondent Debi Evans called their actions at this board meeting cruel and shameful.
As of this writing, the agency has received 460,000 reports of serious side effects from COVID-19 shots, but no one bothers to help victims in dire straits. not present. UK Column can report that the reaction of vaccine victims who saw the footage was one of anger and utter disbelief. They saw their lives effectively erased from the conference, and their experiences seemed to have no meaning to those around the table. The reality of the callousness and contempt shown towards them was palpable.
UK Column News has been reporting on MHRA Board meetings for over a year. In her Nov. 16 video report (link in the middle of the italicized rubric above), Debi Evans said that the November Board of Directors will hear from the public, experts, and those affected by vaccine injuries. Revealed the huge amount of questions submitted. These questions were not answered or acknowledged. According to the MHRA protocol: all Questions raised must be answered within 18 business days.
The MHRA is 70% funded by the pharmaceutical industry. However, this is not considered a conflict of interest. Uncertain of its own position, it is difficult to say whether the agency is a regulator or an enabler (the latter term is proudly used by Dame June Lane to praise her agency's recent work). ). Some may mistake the MHRA for a glorified sales team at a big pharma company.
For those who have been harmed by vaccines, those who have been harmed as a result of trusting the MHRA and 'science', who expected safety to be prioritized and to be heard after suffering serious harm. This meeting was painful and even traumatic to observe. As several board members acknowledged, vaccine-injured people are not cheerfully uncorking champagne bottles.
The UK Column will continue to report on the publicly displayed behavior of the MHRA and those who work within it. For those of us watching in horror, it is clear that it is not fit for purpose, with government agencies revolving around serving as a fodder for complaints against drug companies rather than focusing on safety. It looks like it does. Over time, the following medical mantra spread somewhere: First, do no harm It seems that he has been forgotten by his seniors at MHRA. UK Column will continue to demand answers, accountability and support from the MHRA for vaccine victims, and will regularly analyze the agency's board meetings as long as they are held in public.
