All major corporate media outlets were quick to cite this film as being solely responsible for the simultaneous violent uprisings in both Libya and Egypt. However, a closer look at the events leading up to these protests reveals that the film is a highly sophisticated film aimed at antagonizing Muslims around the world in a way that promotes a West-versus-West narrative. It has become clear that it was developed as a public relations tool. The fabled “clash of civilizations” that fueled the global war on terror, now in its 11th year, has cost the global economy hundreds of billions of dollars but has done nothing for security or international peace. No concrete benefits have been obtained. Further evidence suggests that the film's sensation did not cause these demonstrations, nor was it an intentional film aimed at stirring up Islamic anger.
Following the initial protests in Libya and Egypt, the film was artificially tangled up in a wave of discontent by sustained efforts by Western media, and quickly took on a life of its own, sparking extreme public anger in Sudan and Somalia. It was the trigger that caused it. , Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and India.
The development of this story reveals the Western media's issue strategy. The film was quickly labeled as “amateur” and “low-budget” by US-led news organizations such as Al Jazeera, which said, “The streets of Muslims are voicing their anger, and Islamic countries around the world are now “We are calling for the enactment of a law prohibiting blasphemy.” This set the stage for a fairly controlled UN debate in which US President Barack Obama took to the podium and announced that he would be imposing new international fines and judicial charges on the public through a new proposed legal framework. He took the stage to fend off Islamic demands from member states to criminalize and hold people accountable. President Obama appeared to be defending Americans' right to “free expression” through a new international “hate speech” law that he said was unenforceable.
“The Innocence of Muslims” – Excerpt from the movie
A quick assessment of the production values of Muhammad's films reveals that they are by no means low-budget, featuring over 40 actors with full costumes, make-up, post-production and grading, and complete production. They also have a functioning Middle Eastern set. Hollywood standard sound and lighting production. The work's price can easily be estimated at around $500,000, with other estimates putting it at over $1 million. Hyping this film as an “amateur film” appears to be part of a coordinated effort by the media to reduce this film to just another irresponsible and reckless YouTube video, effectively making it impossible to watch in the future. This opens the door to permissible censorship for all YouTube content.
But the most interesting and least reported part of this media event is how the film was manipulated by its alleged creators, and again by a series of YouTube publishers. The key premise is that there was nothing easy about the production or dissemination of this film, and all available evidence suggests that this film is a highly complex and expensive piece of hostile propaganda, and at worst is a carefully guarded piece of propaganda. It shows that this is a psychological operation planned in the future.
First, the title of this film, “Muslim Innocence,'' has had three forms in the past. The first casting call for the Los Angeles-based production was in July 2011 and was titled Desert Warriors. The film was subsequently produced and shown in an empty theater at the Vine Theater in Los Angeles on June 30, 2012, and was given the title “The Innocence of Bin Laden'', and was later made into a series on a Youtube channel. It has been reported. It was posted on July 1st by Sam Bashir (pseudonym) and is titled “The Real Life of Muhammad.” The film, which was eventually renamed “Innocence of Muslims,” was released on September 10 as a 14-minute highlight reel of the entire film on a YouTube channel credited as “News Politics Now.” That was when it was released. According to American researcher and commentator Montagraph, News Politics Now may have ties to Stanley & Associates, a U.S. government defense contractor based in Arlington, Virginia. It is said that there is.
The film's purported producer, Sam Bashir, is likely one of Nakoula Basri Nakoula, an Egyptian Coptic Christian based in the United States, previously reported by the website Smoking Gun. It has been revealed that he is a U.S. federal informant who was convicted of check fraud. To date, there is little evidence confirming the details of Nakoula's actual involvement in the film, but based on his informant profile, he played the role of the controversial film's mascot. There is a high possibility that he is a dangerous person.
Steve Klein – US Army Veteran and Federal Counterterrorism Specialist
Of further interest are Steve Klein and Alan Roberts, aka Robert Brownell. Klein is listed as a “consultant” on the film, and is a military veteran and federal government counterterrorism expert. Brownell is the owner of the conservative Christian websites Spirit Less and Divine Revelations. These connections represent the chain that binds the Hollywood film finance community, the U.S. federal government, and the American Christian Zionist movement. The reaction to the film was predictable, but the initial protests in Libya and Egypt were not the result of the film's release on YouTube, and the subsequent uprisings in Sudan, Somalia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Yemen. It should be noted that this is the result. About the concerted efforts of Western media to attribute the cause of Muslim riots solely to the YouTube phenomenon.
The fake media event was then used as leverage by Western media and parroted by the US government to appear to be the “sole catalyst” for Muslim anger, and subsequently around the September anniversary. It was used to incite a wave of Muslim protests. 11th place. By controlling the timing of these events, the rulers of Western organizations promote their own “clash of civilizations” narrative and label all anti-NATO and anti-American events as irrational and extremist, intent on destruction. It was possible to frame it as the work of a Muslim mob. Both the Western Judeo-Christian way of life and the secular way of life. The violent lynching of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his staff, and the dismissal of the U.S. embassies in Libya and Egypt, were also not due to the simmering anxieties directed at Muslims, but rather the release of Muhammad's film and the “clash of civilizations.” ” is believed to be the cause. These are the architects of NATO and the bureaucrats they sent to Libya, who systematically plundered the country and destroyed society following the overthrow and execution of Mummar Gaddafi and his government.
In fact, at least two different protests were scheduled for that week, long before Muhammad's film was officially released. In a thorough manner, Western intelligence agencies appear to have orchestrated the behind-the-scenes operations of this incident, with information hinting that it was “Al Qaeda” that carried out the attack on the US embassy in Benghazi in retaliation for the alleged killings in Pakistan. was released to the media. June 4, 2012, US drone strike on Libyan-born Abu Yahya al-Libi (also known as Hassan Mohamed Qaid), another “number two man” of al-Qaeda. It should be noted that any so-called “al-Qaeda” proclamations are likely to be directed and coordinated by shadowy Western agencies and are therefore considered, in extreme cases, to be a controlled insurgency. It is.
The most likely and more believable story is that an anti-Western, anti-NATO grassroots movement led primarily by Libyan Gaddafi supporters believes that the vast majority of Libyans, 5.6 million people, viz. The idea was that NATO and its terrorist proxies were beginning to carry out what they had set out to do. Over the past 18 months, we have destroyed this country, robbed it of the best standard of living in Africa, and it will never be a citizen again.
These protests are being led by Western architects known in Libya as the Green Resistance, or talub, which means “loyalist” in Arabic, and who want to be erased from public life. It's a group. It is anti-NATO, anti-imperialist, and pro-secular nationalist, a far cry from the Islamist puppets of Washington and NATO installed in Tripoli and Benghazi. They reportedly attacked Western and NTC targets and executed Libyan collaborators who had betrayed Gaddafi and sided with NATO. This could be accomplished by the CIA and other Western or Israeli intelligence agencies infiltrating this resistance movement, radicalizing it along jihadist lines, gradually stripping it of its ideological leadership, and then replacing it with American leadership. The standard procedure would be to try to change things. British or Israeli-controlled al-Qaeda agents.
Given the genuine anti-American, anti-NATO sentiment spreading throughout North Africa and the Middle East, neither the United States nor NATO member states are willing to support genuine “Arab Spring” uprisings in countries such as Libya, Egypt, Yemen, and Bahrain. It is clear that it cannot be completely controlled. , Tunisia and Sudan show no real improvement in the socio-economic conditions of the lower classes. The ideal political and civil model for the West in these countries appears to be a strong military police state with powerless but obedient pro-Western puppet leaders at the helm. Apart from the obvious energy and resource prizes, Western international banking financiers and their arms trade and production customers can benefit from the destabilization and police state measures in these countries, making them vulnerable to Western intervention and It can further perpetuate the economic world promoted by aggressive foreign countries. policy.
Based on recent history, it is clear that the greatest enemies of the United States, Britain, France, Israel, and NATO allies are the independent secular nationalist states in the region. This could include any country that is not tied to U.S. foreign aid, privatized international banking, or privatized national utilities or infrastructure assets. Both Libya and Syria, as well as Iran, fit squarely into this geopolitical context, all of which are being politically manipulated by the United States and its NATO allies who want a future banking and imperialist-friendly state restructuring. It is also a military target for regime change. Client countries in this region.
After all, none of this can be achieved without the consent of Western democratic voters, and this is due to the “clash of civilizations,” or East vs. West narratives continually propagated by the Western political class and corporate media. It means that there must be. Order to maintain an atmosphere of fear, tension, and continued conflict throughout the Middle East and Central Asia. Muhammad's controversial film was a tool used to promote this open and unapologetic policy that many analysts believe is inching the world closer to a multi-regional global military conflict. It was nothing more than
