This interview was conducted by Neil Harrison. British column on the harms of lockdowns.
Andrew Bridgen made headlines after making an explosive statement on X (formerly Twitter). Recess debate Friday, October 20, 2023 Exposing the excess mortality crisisBut this issue is not going away, and it could become the biggest scandal of the century, yet the broadcast media remains silent.
In an exclusive interview with UK Column, the MP for North West Leicestershire spoke about the content of the speech, the reaction to it and what he hopes to achieve with it.
There was a lot of cheering in the House of Commons before and after your speech. Was the gallery full and did you meet with members of the public afterwards?
There were about 20 seats left in the gallery, but for some reason they were closed off, and in the central lobby there were 150 people who had come all the way there to watch the speeches but couldn't get in. The security guards were very kind and turned on the TV in the cafe and let us sit there, have tea, and watch the speeches live from the same building. After the recess debate was over, I went over to see them and said,
Look, you haven't seen the speech. I'll show it to you again when we get to Parliament Square.
Since then, the response has been overwhelmingly positive. I've heard you've received thousands of emails – what are they like?
They are just happy that this issue is finally being raised. Let's not downplay what has happened. This is the first speech on excess mortality in the UK Parliament, and probably in the world, and it will not be the last. I have been petitioning for over nine months and it has been rejected over 20 times. It has always been rejected until now, so something is moving. I also sensed that my colleagues in the House of Commons are starting to change their position in their response letters to their constituents, even if they will not attend the recess debates.
I think Health and Social Care Minister Stephen Barclay has changed his position. When I asked him on Tuesday about the correlation between the increase in deaths from heart disease and the start of vaccinations, he was open to looking at the data. I also think Vaccines Minister Maria Caulfield's limited response to yesterday's recess debate was less about “safe and effective” and more about “we need to see the data.” At least this is a start and a move in the right direction.
Is interest from MPs coming from both the left and right of politics, or is there more interest from Conservative MPs?
This is from the Conservative Party. Most of it is self-protection by lobbying voters who know what is going on. In January the (Conservative) party basically told me through their executives that they want to cover up excess deaths and the harm of vaccines for 20 years. That is unacceptable to me, and I don't think the public will accept it, and I don't think the public will understand it. It's a question of how quickly we get to the truth. And of course, the longer it takes to get to the truth, the more people will be harmed and sadly die because of these experimental vaccines that are unsafe and ineffective.
Do you think the mainstream media will pick up on this? You've sent out press packs to newspapers and TV stations around the country.
As soon as the speech was over, the press pack was distributed. I distributed the press pack to show that they cannot pry into any of the facts or data that I have mentioned in my speech. I have to be very careful to put on record what I say on the floor because if I get one thing wrong out of 100, they will focus on that and try to discredit the entire speech.
My speech was fact-checked by top scientists, and then they gathered all the scientific papers that backed up the claims, and that was sent to every media outlet, every TV station, and that's what I've done with my last three speeches. December onwards (2022)but nobody notices it. It's almost a conspiracy of silence.
But now many people's friends, relatives and neighbors are dying unexpectedly and prematurely in extraordinary circumstances, and sadly the death toll is not slowing down. So governments cannot afford to cover this up, because this is affecting too many people around the world.
I read a paper last week that I didn't cite in Congress, but it estimated the number of deaths. It estimated that one in 800 people will die for every dose of the vaccine, but the deaths are not evenly distributed across age groups; after 40, your chances of dying after vaccination double every five years, and for those over 85, that chance drops to one in 20. In the over 85 age group, we're seeing more deaths than we did during the pandemic, but nobody wants to talk about that.
Another part of your speech was to use Pfizer's own data to show how dangerous these shots are.
The excess deaths we're seeing around the world are mostly heart-related. Four people died from heart attacks in the Pfizer clinical trial, compared to one in the placebo. That's a pretty big number, right? They only followed people who were injected with a very carefully made vaccine. do not have The same formula they created for the large scale rollout. And they only followed people for eight weeks. After eight weeks, there is no efficacy data anywhere in the world for Pfizer, because after eight weeks, they ruined the trial by giving the vaccine to the placebo group.
This is a criminal act because by vaccinating the placebo group, they destroyed the data, so there is no way to go back and compare the health outcomes of those who were vaccinated with those who were not. This should never be done. In my opinion, this is a criminal act against public health.
But there's no hiding the fact that in Australia, most people have been vaccinated, so we have a perfect control group. in front They got Covid. And what we saw was most of Australia didn't have Covid and had more deaths because of the vaccination. There's no other explanation.
In your speech you mentioned the Office for National Statistics hiding data.
In my view, the ONS is deliberately concealing the true mortality rate because there is a huge amount of deaths occurring, mainly of young people, who die when they were not expected to die, and they are referred to the coroner and therefore do not appear on the weekly death certificates, which is why the ONS weekly death certificate figures for young people deaths are significantly lower.
We know that the Coroner's Court is truly overwhelmed. It has not been given any additional resources and is burdened with thousands of extra cases. It will take years before it can clear this backlog. We will never know the truth about mortality rates over the past three years. In terms of transparency and public accountability, this is unacceptable.
I don't think this is a coincidence. I think it's deliberate. The UK Health Security Agency is refusing to release data from its dataset on vaccinations and deaths in vaccinated people. And the UK government won't investigate people who are suddenly required to receive Personal Independence Payments. (Sickness and injury allowance) People who got sick in the last 3 years and are now unable to work. A quick analysis of these people and their vaccination status would show if there is a link to vaccination. The government will not do such a cheap analysis because they know very well what the results will show.
Now that this recess debate is over, what do you think is the next step? Will we have to have another recess debate?
No, I think I would. Get name Of all the MPs who attended, I think if we all signed it we would have enough MPs to get a three hour debate in the next four weeks to keep the pressure on the Backbench Business Committee.
I believe another Member mentioned your persistent efforts to bring this debate publicly before Parliament, which is the place where this issue should be made known to members of the public whose opinions may be swayed by the BBC.
After my dogged efforts on the Post Office Horizon scandal, the Leicester clothing industry slavery issue and my nine-year effort to get Keith Vaz out of Parliament (which I did), my nickname in Parliament was “The Pit Bull” anyway, because once Andrew Bridgen bit, he didn't let go.
Was there anything else that struck you about the speech (which was very powerful)? I got the impression that you had to hold back not tears, but anger at being treated unfairly.
I felt angry for the deaths, and I'll be honest, I nearly cried at the end, because it really touched me especially about what we can do to stop the rollout of these vaccines. When I see people getting the sixth booster shot and so on, my heart breaks for them, because the evidence is all there, it's indisputable.
For all this, there must come a day of judgment. And I hope it comes soon, because it is a crime against humanity. And this is not just a problem in our country, it is happening all over the world. The latest figures I have seen, given the number of vaccines administered, and calculating with a mortality rate of 1 in 800, which is even higher in the elderly population, we are talking about 17 million excess deaths worldwide. So I can't find the vocabulary to express the horror of whatever this is. And, certainly, it is quite upsetting at times.
When the speech was broadcast live on the BBC, Put a “ticker” on my speech I said that the vaccine is actually safe and effective. It must have been planned in advance. They had no reaction to what I said. I have never heard of any politician doing that in a speech in Parliament. Maybe they are scared. But at the end of the day, they can mock me, attack me, do whatever they want, but the truth will come out. And that is the truth that I said on the floor of the chamber, and I will take responsibility for every word of it, and so will the scientists who backed it up with evidence.
History is ( Safe and Effective The mainstream media and the mainstream media are totally taken in by this. They are totally involved and don't see a way out. They will fight tooth and nail to stop the truth from coming out, because it would be a devastating blow to them too.
Since your speech, have any mainstream journalists approached you?
Only one person, whose name I won't mention, texted me and said,
Andrew, the speech you gave yesterday on excess mortality will one day be historic.
History is written by the victors, so surely we might as well win.
That's a great way to end the interview, is there anything else you'd like to add?
I'm scheduled to give another big speech on Tuesday (October 24, 2023). 10-minute rule motionAnd I will try to get permission from the House of Commons to introduce a bill (Sovereignty and Referendum Bill) that will prevent the Government from handing over sovereignty to supranational organisations like the World Health Organisation. So I will try to make my colleagues realise that the Pandemic Preparedness Convention and the amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005 pose a great danger to our freedoms, human rights and sovereignty by giving dictatorial powers to the Director-General of WHO. What could be the problem?
Yes, if we cede authority to the WHO, it has to do with vaccines.
In the next pandemic, who knows when it will emerge from the lab, they will insist on mandatory vaccination with a dangerous experimental vaccine. I can't think of a more nightmare scenario. And as long as I'm breathing, it won't happen.
You can watch Andrew Bridgen MP's closing speech on excess deaths in full below. here.
Main articles image: Recess Debate on Trends in Excess Mortality, House of Commons, London
